TCM04: TEI Council Conference Call 21 Jan 03Lou Burnard
For distribution to TEI Council members for
corrections; corrected version to TEI website.
Made by editing JMU's email of 21 Jan, together with notes
taken by LB
Converted to P5First draft
The following were present: Syd Bauman (SB), David
Birnbaum (DB), Lou Burnard (LB), Matthew Driscoll (MD), David
Durand (DD), Tomaz Erjavec (TE), Laurent Romary (LR),
Susan Schreibman (SS), John Unsworth (JU), Perry Willett (PW),
Christian Wittern (CW).
Actions from previous meeting (15 minutes):
Syd was to have revised his notes of the meeting on 26 June. Deemed to be
done, or no longer relevant.Lou and John to resolve the technical editor position, for SGML migration
workgroup. Sarah Wells would be working as technical author
for Chris Ruotolo and the Migration Workgroup. LB noted that
the wider issue of support for TEI website authoring was still
to be addressed. Christian and workgroup to have drafted document on attribute usage --
Christian reports that this has been held up: As there are still some open
issues on this and other topics in the WG, I would like to postpone this
discussion until we have a clearer picture of how the outcome of this
question will relate to our recommendations.. A date of Jan 31 was
agreed. All of us were to articulate namespace policy and review P5 contents
by this time. Not done. See further item 3, below.Joint ISO-TEI activity on Feature Structures. LR and LB
had been discussing this. The plan is to propose a
revision of the current TEI chapters on feature structures and
feature systems declarations as a new work
item for ISO TC37/SC4. The work would be carried out within a
joint TEI/ISO work group, and is summarized in two documents
circulated earlier to the council in draft form, which are to be made available on the
website shortly. 23
Jan Retag and edit draft documents on FS
WG. Council approved this work item in principle, and
would review the draft work plan as soon as possible. The
proposal has to be submitted to ISO by end February.14 Feb Review
proposal for FS WG and send comments to list
Council noted that participation in ISO workgroups had to be
self-funding. LR was asked to provide an estimate of the
likely cost to the TEI of its participation. 31 Jan provide estimated
budget for TEI participation in proposed FS WGEditors' proposal for
handling nontrivial changes to the Guidelines. Council
proposed this should be put into action, but requested
clarification as to whether it was intended to use a rolling
submission model (whereby editors would collect
proposals and act on them periodically) or a rapid response model
(where proposals would be acted on individually). CW asked
whether tei-tech would be preferable to tei-l as a vehicle for
discussion of such proposals. LB
and JU felt that there should be only one list. 28 FebRevise
EDW78 and circulate new draft for approval Review of workplan and timetable for TEI P5 (held over from last
meeting). Council felt that it needed more information about the
implications of the various technical choices proposed here and
in Sebastian's email before the meeting. It was agreed to form a
special task force to work on the issues and make specific
technical proposals. Sebastian was nominated for chair; DD, LR,
CW volunteered to serve. A progress report would be needed at
the next call. 20
Feb Form new work group on architectural issues and
report back at next conference call. Status of Manuscript description work (held over
from last meeting). JU reported that he had written to Consuelo
Dutschke, but that she had been taken seriously ill. He had also
spoken (again) to Merrilee Proffit and received email from
Ambrosio Piazzoni. He suggested extending the deadline for a
submission from the TEI MSS WG until the end of February. Council
felt that this would not be appropriate, since the deadline had
already been extended twice. Instead, it was agreed that the
Council should constitute a new task force, jointly chaired by
MJD and MP, charged with harmonization of the various proposals
in this area as rapidly as possible. David Birnbaum was
also volunteered to join the new group. 31 Jan to write to CD and AP, requesting them to
submit the current state of their work to the new task
force31 Jan to draft a
charge for the new taskforce and circulate to the Council.
Progress on IMLS proposal. PW briefly reported that the
proposal was on schedule for submission to IMLS by deadline of 1
Feb. Both he and JU expressed optimism about the outcome of the
proposal.
New
workgroup on SVG and chapter on Trees/Graphs proposed by
Patrick Durusau. Council agreed that the question of whether or not
the current chapter on Trees and Graphs should be retained or
revised was distinct from the question of how
to integrate other XML schemes such as SVG. It was agreed to ask
Patrick to constitute a task force which should review current
work in formalization of tree and graph structures, and make a
specific recommendation with regard to the current chapter of
the Guidelines. He should solicit interest in this work on
TEI-L; it was suggested that Chris Catton (on the SO markup wg)
would be a useful contributor. 31 Jan To convey
Council's view on proposed wg on trees and graphs to PDSelection of chair for group to work on Core Tags and
Schema. Council agreed that this should be a task for the group
already proposed for Sebastian. Update from character encoding workgroup. CW reported
that the group was drafting a proposal concerning a replacement for SDATA
entities which it was intended to submit to W3C, hopefully with
the support of the TEI. This would be available for comment by
the end of January. 15
FebTo review and comment on CE WG's proposals concerning
SDATA when available. The wg was also working on two other
documents, one to replace the current chapter 4 of P4, and the
other to define next generation WSDs. These
drafts should be ready for submission by the end of April. No
further meetings of the group were planned.
Update from Standoff Markup Workgroup. DD reported that
drafts of several documents were starting to be circulated on the
workgroup's discussion list. A new document was planned on the
rationale behind some of the recommendations. 31 Jan to
make wg drafts available on website The full workgroup on SGML/XML migration was due to meet
in College Park in early February. Chris Ruotolo would report on
its progress at the next meeting.Date of next conference call: 18 March, at the same
time. The Council would next meet face to face in Oxford, May 16-17. 31 Jan check
arrangements for Oxford meetingAny Other Business. LB said that he was chairing the
Programme Committee for this year's Digital Resources in the
Humanities Conference, to be held at the University of
Gloucestershire's Cheltenham campus 31 Aug to 3 Sept, and that TEI submissions
would be very welcome.